A study investigating the transition from forests to savannas and vice versa has found trees could be the key protagonists.
The paper 鈥, published in Nature Plants, found advantages and disadvantages of trees, links to the change from a forest to a savanna.
Savannas are important ecosystems that cover large parts of the globe. Previous studies to understand how savannas function has focussed on disturbance. If fire and herbivores are kept away, savannas become tropical forests. If forests are burned they turn into grasslands which may soon become savannas.
Researcher, Dr Chandra Bellasio, said: 鈥淚t is unclear how disturbance could have caused the original decline of closed tropical forests, as these types of forests do not burn and do not support large herbivores.鈥
It is known that savannas evolved under decreasing CO2 concentration, accompanied by an increase in drought. This drop in CO2 was mainly driven by the uplift of mountains like the Himalayas, because when silicate rock is weathered, the resulting calcium and magnesium ions deposit in ocean鈥檚 beds 鈥榯rapping鈥 CO2.
鈥淚n our experiment we measured the effect of drought and CO2 concentration on three plant types: a forest tree, a savanna tree and a savanna grass,鈥 said Dr Bellasio.
鈥淲e show that while trees were advantaged under high CO2, the forest tree was the most disadvantaged by low CO2 and prolonged drought, but, at the same time it delayed the response to drought and was able to reduce respiration.
鈥淭he transition from forest to savanna and vice versa could therefore be primed by specific advantages and disadvantages of trees. Grasses, herbivores and fire, would have a less active role than previously thought, opportunistic spectators ready to take advantage of tree weaknesses. Trees would be the key protagonists of the actions, making their own fortune and misfortune.鈥
The study was part of a worth 鈧2.5m, awarded to Professor David Beerling FRS.