Research in Historical Linguistics
Find out more about how linguists research Historical Linguistics through looking at some example research.
鈥淗ands in the field鈥: a practical example
Here is an example of how the pronunciation of a language has been reconstructed in the past:
Various scholars, such as Girolamo Aleandro (1480鈥1542) and Aldus Manutius (1449鈥1515) judged that the pronunciation of Latin in the Middle Ages had drifted from the original descriptions of ancient grammarians.
For example, Varro affirmed that in the word centum, the orthographic <n> is realised as the velar nasal [艐]. Based on this hint, Erasmus (1466鈥1536) established that the velar nasal [艐] would have made sense only if <c> (before front vowels) represented the velar sound /k/ (as in /鈥檏e艐t蕣m/), not /s/ or / 失/ (as in the pronunciation of the Middle Ages).
Of course, the further back in time we go, the less precise Historical Linguistic accounts are.
Below is an example from Classical Antiquity:
The following is one of the few comments from the Cratylus by Plato (424/423 BC鈥348/347 BC), in this regard:
[鈥 Shall I tell you what I suspect to be the true explanation of this and several other words? 鈥擬y belief is that they are of foreign origin. For the Hellenes, especially those who were under the dominion of the barbarians, often borrowed from them (Salus (ed.), 1969: 44).
He admits the possibility that Greek has been influenced by ancient foreign languages but does not comment on this further. The designation Plato adopts for alien speakers 鈥 尾维蟻尾伪蟻慰喂 (literally, 鈥渢hose who say 鈥榖ar bar鈥欌; hence, the word 鈥渂arbarian鈥) 鈥 is probably indicative of the Greeks鈥 attitude towards foreign and past languages, and why they were not interested in researching this topic any further.
References:
Salus, P. H. (1969) On Language: From Plato to Von Humbolt. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.