Widening inequalities for children in the North of England cost billions, increase poverty and harm children鈥檚 lives

A major new report out today paints a stark picture of inequality for children growing up in the North of England post-pandemic compared to those in the rest of the country.

A single parent holds the hand of their young child as they walk down the road.
  • Government advised to take immediate measures to tackle child poverty in the North in new collaborative report on growing inequalities in post-pandemic England
  • Children in the North found to have poorer outcomes in health, education, careers and economics
  • Government need to address uneven geographical distribution of support for children or the aims of 鈥榣evelling up鈥 will not be achieved

A major new report out today paints a stark picture of inequality for children growing up in the North of England post-pandemic compared to those in the rest of the country. 

The considerable costs to society and the UK鈥檚 economy of rising inequality are outlined in report, produced by the Northern Health Science Alliance (NHSA) and N8 Research Partnership (N8), and written by over 40 leading academics from across the North of England; including from the University of 葫芦影业.

The report looks at a wide range of factors, from child poverty to children in care, to build up a picture of The Child of the North. It sets out 18 clear recommendations that can be put in place to tackle the widening gap between the North and the rest of England.

Sarah Salway, Professor of Public Health from the University of 葫芦影业 said: 鈥淥ur analysis across the piece highlights the intersection of socioeconomic deprivation and racial discrimination impacting the lives of ethnic minority children who continue to be overlooked in much local and national policy.

鈥淲e were delighted to contribute to a report which convincingly demonstrates the pressing need for action and investment to redress the higher levels of poverty and poor health outcomes among children in the North of the country.鈥

The report shows that:

  • Compared to children in England as a whole, they are more likely to die under the age of one.
  • Children in the North are more likely to be obese than a child elsewhere in England. At age 11: 22.6 per cent in the North compared to 20.5 per cent in the rest of England.
  • The mental health conditions that children in the North developed during the pandemic could cost an estimated 拢13.2 billion in lost wages over their working lives.
  • Children in the North of England鈥檚 loss of learning, experienced over the course of the pandemic, will cost an estimated 拢24.6 billion in lost wages over lifetime earnings.
  • Pupils in the North East and Yorkshire and Humber lost four-to-five times more learning in primary maths compared to areas in the South (4.0 and 5.3 months鈥 learning loss respectively, compared to less than a month in the South West and London).
  • They missed more schooling in lockdown than their peers elsewhere in England. Only 14 per cent received four or more pieces of offline schoolwork per day, compared with 20 per cent country-wide.
  • Children in the North have a 27 per cent chance of living in poverty compared to 20 per cent in the rest of England.
  • They have a 58 per cent chance of living in a local authority with above average levels of low-income families, compared to 19 per cent in the rest of England.
  • Children in the North are significantly more likely to be in care than those in the rest of England. Of the local authorities with more than 100 children per 10,000 in care, 21 of 26 are in the North.
  • During the pandemic children in the North were lonelier than children in the rest of England. 23 per cent of parents in the North reported that their child was 鈥榦ften鈥 lonely compared to 15 per cent in the rest of the country.
  • Their parents and carers were also more likely to have often been lonely during the first lockdown: 23 per cent in the North compared to 13 per cent in the rest of England.
  • Prior to the pandemic, the North saw much larger cuts to spending on Sure Start children鈥檚 centres. On average, spending was cut by 拢412 per eligible child in the North, compared to only 拢283 in the rest of England.
  • More than one in five children in the North are from an ethnic minority. These children are more likely to live in a deprived area than children from an ethnic minority in the rest of England. 

Hannah Davies, Health Inequalities lead for the Northern Health Science Alliance and report co-author, said: 鈥淭his new report illustrates in no uncertain terms that without significant, properly-funded measures to tackle the entrenched inequalities experienced by children in the North of England, from birth, there will be no levelling up in the country.鈥

Professor of Public Health and Policy at the University of Liverpool and co-lead author of the report David Taylor Robinson, said: 鈥淐hildren growing up in the North of England get a bad deal. Due to poverty and lack of investment, their outcomes are worse across the board - from risk of death in childhood, to obesity, mental health, and education, and the pandemic has made the situation worse. The stark inequalities exposed in our report are preventable and unfair. Levelling up must begin with better policies for children.鈥

Professor of Epidemiology at the University of York and co-lead author of the report Kate Pickett, said: 鈥淟evelling up for the North must be as much about building resilience and opportunities for the Covid generation and for future children as it is about building roads, railways and bridges. But the positive message of this report is that investment in children creates high returns and benefits for society as a whole.鈥

Stephen Parkinson, of the N8 Research Partnership and report co-author, said: 鈥淚f we fail to focus on children in the recovery, we risk burdening them with some of the most enduring consequences of the pandemic. As this report sets out, children growing up in the North have in many ways been disproportionately impacted, and we invite government at all levels to engage with our recommendations to secure the best possible future for them.鈥

The authors have put forward a set of recommendations to tackle the inequalities suffered by children over the course of the pandemic. They include: 

  1. Increase government investment in welfare, health and social care systems that support children鈥檚 health, particularly in deprived areas and areas most affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. 
  2. Tackle the negative impacts of the pandemic in the North through rapid, focused investment in early years services, such as the Health Improvement Fund. This should include health visiting, family hubs and children鈥檚 centres - as supported in the Leadsom review - but with investment proportional to need and area-level deprivation adequately accounted for. 
  3. Commissioners of maternity and early years services must consider the impact of pandemic-related service changes on inequalities in families and children鈥檚 experiences and outcomes. This must shape service delivery during the recovery. 
  4. Take immediate measures to tackle child poverty. Increase child benefit by 拢10 per child per week. Increase the child element in Universal Credit and increase child tax credits. 
  5. Introduce universal free school meals, make the Holiday Activities and Food Programme scheme permanent, and extend it to support all low-income families. Promote the provision of Healthy Start vouchers to all children under five and make current government food standards mandatory in all early years settings. 
  6. Government should prioritise support to deprived localities by increasing the spending available to schools serving the most disadvantaged pupils in England. This requires a reversal of the current approach to resource allocation: the new national funding formula will deliver three-to-four percentage points less funding to schools in poorer areas relative to those in more affluent areas. 
  7. Support educational settings to initiate earlier interventions. Teachers and early years professionals see many of the first indicators of children鈥檚 risk and vulnerabilities. Prioritising strong pupil and staff relationships and collaboration with parents/carers will ensure a firm foundation for meeting children鈥檚 needs, and for a return to learning. 
  8. NHS England and the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities should adopt a public mental health approach that includes a focus on mental ill health prevention early in the life-course, recognising the importance of early detection and prompt access to professional treatment. 
  9. Government should invest in and develop a place-based monitoring system for understanding the longer-term mental health impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on children and parents. Targeted support should then flow to families where needed, including outreach services more closely tailored to the needs of vulnerable parents. 
  10. Area-level measures of children鈥檚 physical and mental health should be developed to better understand place-based inequalities. 
  11. More National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) research should be undertaken into the relationship between child health and economic performance, in particular in understanding the likely causal pathways between these in order to identify entry points for policy. 
  12. Government should reinvest in services that tackle domestic abuse, recognising the part domestic abuse plays, not only in children entering care, but also in high conflict divorce and separation cases, which also feature disproportionately in the North. 
  13. Address the uneven geographic distribution of children鈥檚 residential care, including secure provision, in order to reduce the disproportionate burden on the North. An impact assessment of the disproportionate costs to a range of services in the North due to the number of children with complex care and support needs, is needed and long overdue. 
  14. Embed Equity Impact Assessments in all Covid-19 recovery and other policy processes relating to socioeconomic deprivation at national, regional and local levels. 
  15. Use Children鈥檚 Rights Impact Assessments to anticipate and evaluate the specific impact of Covid-19 recovery strategies on children and young people. Collect, disaggregate and publish relevant data so that the impact of the pandemic on children can be routinely evaluated. 
  16. Promote and expand the Race Disparity Audit, sharpening the focus on children and drawing on disaggregated data by region. Ethnicity should be included in all national public health data collection systems, including child and maternal health datasets. 
  17. Increase the representation of ethnic minority staff within public services and in decision-making processes with specific recruitment targets, recruitment campaigns and greater transparency on the percentage of ethnic minority staff. This should be particularly in leadership positions, in order to reflect the populations served.
  18. Local Covid-19 recovery strategies must be grounded in internationally recognised human rights-based values and principles, notably those contained in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989.

A full copy of the report can be found .


Centres of excellence

The University's cross-faculty research centres harness our interdisciplinary expertise to solve the world's most pressing challenges.